Structured abstract Template
Because they enable reading and keeping information from articles, numerous peer-reviewed journals are following structured abstracts because their favored format for abstracts—including the IEEE deals on expert Communication.
- Describes just what structured abstracts tend to be and just how they benefit visitors
- Provides a sample organized abstract
- Concludes with a template that writers of Transactions articles should follow while preparing their organized abstracts
About Structured Abstracts
Structured abstracts summarize the main element conclusions reported in an article, as well as the ways reaching them. Authors compose organized abstracts to ensure that readers do not need to review a write-up in its entirety to understand conclusions or how those conclusions had been reached.
Certain types of readers find organized abstracts specially advantageous:
- Those who won't read a write-up in its entirety but need to find out the key details, like executives, main investigators on large-scale jobs, and individuals trying to keep up-to-date with the industry.
- Those who have formerly browse the article in its entirety and need certainly to remember key results and never have to re-read the article, including scientists performing an organized report about the literary works.
- Those who are wanting to see whether or not to learn a particular article.
Structured abstracts tend to be comparable in format and style to Executive Summaries given detailed engineering and suggestion reports.
Structured abstracts contrast with subject abstracts, which tend to be brief (100 to 150 words, about 100 terms smaller than a normal structured abstract) and just identify the motifs dealt with by articles, but don't report how the article addresses the themes not as the conclusions achieved.
Test Structured Abstract—Research Article and Integrative Literature Review
Listed here structured abstract summarizes Chen, I. & Chang, C. (2009). Intellectual load concept: an empirical study of anxiety and task performance in language learning. Electronic Journal of analysis in academic Psychology, (2), 729-746.